I learnt early that, unless a writer was extremely gifted, lucky, in/famous or
well connected, there were no shortcuts to becoming a published writer. Like
any other vocation, there are skills and aspects of the art to be learnt and
all require diligence, practice, and the commitment to achieve personal goals.
There is so much more to writing than throwing words onto paper or into a word
processing document. At the very least there is the need to have a basic
understanding of the written language, or a willingness to learn the
fundamentals of grammar and punctuation. To set out without these tools of
trade would be like a carpenter building a house without hammer and nails. There may be a vision of the finished structure, but it will
remain just a vision unless the right equipment is acquired. Likewise, there is
no art or trade that allows an individual to progress from novice to adept,
without serving some sort of training period or apprenticeship under the
guidance of a mentor. In the world of writing, mentoring can take many forms,
from formal learning, short or long courses, workshops, feedback from
competitions, or participation in writers’ groups. Each of these involves the gaining of knowledge, practice, revision and feedback. The process of learning can be an exciting and
personally satisfying experience, with self-pride and appreciation at each new skill learnt, or level reached, however, the nature
and degree of skill development is determined by the receptiveness of the
individual and their ability or willingness to embrace each learning
opportunity.
I have always chosen to be part of a
writing community where interests are shared, skills developed, and creativity
nurtured, finding this beneficial to my growth as a writer in many ways.
Writers’ groups also provide a support network to develop and advance writing,
and can be a vital resource when people begin to submit their work to
competitions and publishers. The fellowship of like-minded people, who freely
share their skills, knowledge, and experience, can strengthen self-confidence
as a writer, depending on their expectation of the group and understanding of
its function and limitations.
Through my involvement with groups,
over many years, I have seen people lose confidence in their writing ability
and there are a number of reasons for this. It may stem from the lack of
understanding
that good writing is more than simply having a great idea or story line; it is
the translation of a concept into a coherent, written form that determines the
quality or value of the work. For some, it is the self imposed expectations and
impatience to attain goals that causes them to ignore essential elements of the
learning process. Lack of self-confidence is frequently interpreted as writer’s
block, and so much has been written on this subject that I have no need to
expand on it here; however, overcoming this is the sole responsibility of the
writer. It is not a phenomenon where blame must be apportioned, it is simply a
temporary state of being, and the more time spent placing external culpability,
the longer the condition will continue. Writers, who place responsibility for their shortcomings on others, are wasting an opportunity to gain valuable insight into their functionality as a writer. By
becoming solution focused, strategies can be put in place that has lasting
benefit.
Writers’ groups are not for everyone.
There are those who feel they have reached their capacity for learning, who may
not trust the opinions or motives of others, or who do not understand the
objective nature of the critiquing process. Preciousness exists within us all
and the writers’ ego can be the greatest obstacle we face in our quest for
positive recognition in our chosen field. This may manifest as an emotional attachment
to a particular piece of writing, resulting in the inability to give or receive
objective reflection or feedback, or from an unwillingness to accept that a
piece of writing may be less than perfect from the point of view of others in
the group. Others perceive themselves to be victims, validating this with
inappropriate remarks and pained expressions when their work is being
critiqued, although they have no qualms about giving candid comment on the work
of others in the group. We all experience brief episodes of preciousness at one
time
or another; it is only when this becomes chronic that it has the capacity to
infect the group with different strains of the virus.
One possible solution for anyone
experiencing difficulty in getting words onto paper is to revisit their
personal writing goals and
how these relate to the group they belong to. If they previously found the
group process of critique constructive, I suggest they try to identify a point
of change and what factors were present at that time. If there have been no
major changes in the functioning of the group, look at what changes may have
occurred on a personal writing level, or whether there has been significant
progress in their writing that would render critique from the group
unnecessary. This self-assessment requires honesty. It is useful to take notes and summarise findings to determine
whether a writing group is conducive to their needs at this time. As part of
this review, it can be helpful to revisit the purpose of the writing group and the processes in place for providing effective critique,
using the following checklist on the following page.
Critiquing Checklist
v Everyone taking their
turn.
v Each person feeling
their opinion is valid and useful.
v Equal time to speak.
v Encouragement and
support of others.
v Comments on the writing,
not the writer.
v Alternatives and
solutions offered as a point of view only.
v Building on the comments
of others.
v Remaining focused on the
task.
v Enabling others to
contribute to the discussion.
v Offering comment that is
specific, concrete, constructive, and suggests alternatives and solutions.
v Raises both negative and
positive points.
v The understanding that
the writer will consider the comments and make up their own mind.
v Focuses upon substantive
issues in the writing, suggesting corrections for the first few minor errors
and leaves the writer to correct the rest.